Speed dating prfile
Speed dating prfile - dating woman of
Given the history, skepticism should be the rule in Syria, not credulity. Bush once said in a different context, “fool me once, shame on — shame on you.
“Witnesses have consistently reported the use of helicopters to drop the chemical barrel bombs used,” said Higgins.Eventually, however, the case blaming Assad for the 2013 sarin attack collapsed.An analysis by genuine weapons experts – Theodore A.Postol, a professor of science, technology and national security policy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Richard M.Lloyd, an analyst at the military contractor Tesla Laboratories – found that the missile that delivered the sarin had a very short range placing its likely firing position in rebel territory. intelligence community had warned Obama how weak the evidence against Assad was.For instance, they learned from townspeople of Al-Tamanah about how the rebels and allied “activists” staged a chlorine gas attack on the night of April 29-30, 2014, and then sold the false story to a credulous Western media and, initially, to the U. The latter also provided a video titled ‘site where second barrel containing toxic chlorine gas was dropped tamanaa 30 April 14’” Some other witnesses alleging a Syrian government attack offered curious claims about detecting the chlorine-infused “barrel bombs” based on how the device sounded in its descent. Some interviewees had referred to a distinct whistling sound of barrels that contain chlorine as they fall. For instance, the Telegraph in London reported that “Videos allegedly taken in Al-Tamanah …
The witness statement could not be corroborated with any further information.” However, the claim itself is absurd since it is inconceivable that anyone could detect a chlorine canister inside a “barrel bomb” by “a distinct whistling sound.” The larger point, however, is that the jihadist rebels in Al-Tamanah and their propaganda teams, including relief workers and activists, appear to have organized a coordinated effort at deception complete with a fake video supplied to U. purport to show the impact sites of two chemical bombs.
Why Assad and his military would choose such a moment to launch a deadly sarin attack, killing mostly civilians, made little sense.
But this became another rush to judgment in the West that brought the Obama administration to the verge of launching a devastating air attack on the Syrian military that might have helped Al Qaeda’s Syrian affiliate and/or the Islamic State win the war.
But the map was later disproved because only one rocket carried sarin (the one on the right) and it had only a fraction of the necessary range.
Assad also was facing a “red line” threat from President Obama warning him of possible U. military intervention if the Syrian government deployed chemical weapons.
“As it stands, around a dozen chemical barrel bomb attacks have been alleged in that region in the last three weeks.” To finish up pointing the finger of guilt at the government, the Telegraph added that “The regime is the only party in the civil war that possesses helicopters” – a claim that also has been in dispute since the rebels had captured government air assets and had received substantial military assistance from Saudi Arabia, Turkey, the United States, Israel, Jordan and other countries.